Up until now, I have never had the opportunity to write freely without critique. I have always written for a critic, such as a teacher. Theoretically, English teachers are mandated to critique and grade students on the structure, vocabulary, style, and substance of the writing without letting personal biases interfere with the process. However, in my experience, the contrary stands true. High school has taught me that reading into a teacher's personal interests and stances on controversial subjects, such as politics and religion, can be beneficial when writing under their critique. Accommodating to these biases in my writing may conflict with my own beliefs, but the benefits of seeing "90" or above next to my name on a spreadsheet succeed the drawbacks of not having put my own, true conflicting ideas in my writing. When accomplishing this task, the teacher is almost guaranteed to be appeased, and the grade I receive reflects that.
In a system where graded assignments and exams essentially determine the future of a student, getting the A on an English essay, or any other writing assignment, becomes a primary objective. Us students are told the importance of voice and tone in our writing, but are veiled from the dark presence of teacher bias. I have learned, time and time again, that this presence is much larger than most think. Discreetly mastering the art of bias catering means indefinite success in writing, in the eyes of critique.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with what your saying. Wether people admit to it or not if your reading something that you do not agree with, even if it is well written, the odds are that you will say you do not like it. More often than not it it much easier to be subjective rather than objective. All of our biases wether they are minor or something as bad as racism, effect are opinions on most everything we encounter especially in literature.
ReplyDelete